<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPod Video vs. iPod Touch</title>
	<link>http://www.imroot.com/2008/07/02/ipod-video-vs-ipod-touch/</link>
	<description>Because the world needs to hear what I have to say.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon,  1 Dec 2008 20:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.imroot.com/2008/07/02/ipod-video-vs-ipod-touch/#comment-3078</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 16:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.imroot.com/2008/07/02/ipod-video-vs-ipod-touch/#comment-3078</guid>
		<description>If it works like the iPhone, you can double-tap the "Home" button to bring up the iPod controls overlay from whatever you're doing.  Still doesn't have the tactile feedback, though.  I essentially agree with you based on my experience with the iPhone.  I'd rather have my (or a new 3rd gen) Nano for music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it works like the iPhone, you can double-tap the &#8220;Home&#8221; button to bring up the iPod controls overlay from whatever you&#8217;re doing.  Still doesn&#8217;t have the tactile feedback, though.  I essentially agree with you based on my experience with the iPhone.  I&#8217;d rather have my (or a new 3rd gen) Nano for music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
